- Gananoque Houseboat Rentals & Charters
- Cosmopolitan 16 things to know before dating a short girl
- Helen Gurley Brown: how to have it all
- My Letter To Cosmopolitan Magazine
Ruby Rose on the front of Cosmopolitan magazine Source: Publisher Bauer Media announced the decision on Tuesday. The magazine is the latest Bauer title to go under, as the company struggles with falling print sales in the digital era. It has not been an easy decision to make, however, the commercial viability of the magazine in Australia is no longer sustainable. We have to ensure that we are continually reshaping and defining the business so that our readers of today, and those of tomorrow, remain engaged with the content we publish and the platforms upon which we deliver.
It has helped to launch the careers of media personalities, supported great brands and causes, and inspired millions of young women across the country. Cosmopolitan Magazine has been around since so it has seen quite a great deal of change over that time. The evolution of The Cosmopolitan Magazine into what is known today as Cosmo shows just how dramatic that change has been. Typically, each issue would have five to eight short-stories, a full novelette, a full short novel, and some article on fashion and health.
During this time, the cover art was almost exclusively illustrated — even when the covers featured celebrities. With the introduction of television, there was a drastic decline in the demand for fiction-based magazines.
In response to the waning sales there was a radical shift in the direction of Cosmopolitan. In the mid sixties, Helen Gurley Brown stepped in as editor in chief. She brought with her the message of sexual freedom for single women, and started replacing the cover illustrations with photos of young models in minimal clothing. Sales increased as a result. Since then the magazine has become more sexually centered.
- Cosmo axed: Cosmopolitan magazine no longer in print.
- Things you should know before dating a short girl;
It still features many articles on having pleasurable sex and maintain fulfilling relationships. There is a much greater emphasis on how women can make themselves more desirable to men.
Gananoque Houseboat Rentals & Charters
One look at the website reveals the tone of the magazine. These are the first three articles listed:. The late Kurt Vonnegut who had multiple short stories featured in Cosmopolitan in the fifties had this to say about the magazine: They have also been criticized for perpetuating a nearly impossible standard of beauty and for retouching models to make them appear thinner. Today Cosmopolitan retains almost no reminants of its origins.
It is fascinating to see how it has shifted with the culture and how our culture has changed because of it. There's something touchingly quaint about the caption "Audrey Hepburn wears pretty clothes in her new movie.
- Dedicated to your stories and ideas..
- metal head dating australia.
- easy to hook up in london.
- Cosmopolitan 16 things you should know before dating a short girl.
- Cosmopolitan 16 things you should know before dating a short girl.
I am old enough to have read Cosmopolitan before Helen Gurley Brown took over. It was definitely a magazine for readers. Gradually the articles became more aimed at getting and pleasing a man and the fiction became snippets of erotic fantasy.
Cosmopolitan 16 things to know before dating a short girl
Now when I see an issue of Cosmopolitan I am saddened that it seems to be directed to an audience with the collective attention span of a gnat. Any portion that pretends to be an article seems limited to bullets and twitter-esque snark. And now it's out of business. Em, absolutely, i used to buy magazines all the time but decided to cut them out completely a few years ago, if i compare how i feel about myself after flicking through a mag like that to how feel when i don't, it makes me wonder why i ever bought them.
I used to read cosmogirl too, I from what I remember it was pretty good, I know I learnt a lot about sexual health and stds from it. I find the 70's issue the most interesting of these examples--it really shows the transition of the magazine from more serious content to "harrowingly explicit sex manual. And in the recent one it's all sex, all the time, except for one article about not gettin' raped. All magazines are going in that direction.
Helen Gurley Brown: how to have it all
The last time I bought an issue of "Better Homes and Gardens" a magazine I used to love , I aged through the whole thing looking for an article and never found one. It's all bulleted lists, multi-colored text boxes, and photo captions. I just love the "get a healthy, sexy vagina" headline.
Like what, the primary sex organ of a woman is not inherently "sexy"? If a vagina isn't sexy, I don't know what is. Perhaps the article discusses waxing, or kegels, or labiaplasty, or some other way to sex up your sex. I'm ashamed to say that I read Cosmo as a teenager, shortly after I stopped reading Seventeen, and absolutely attribute a lifelong struggle with eating disorders in large part to these rags.
Thankfully, I can now find a perineum on my own and no longer need Cosmo's recycled sex tips. Really interesting how a change that reflected women's liberation and the sexual revolution in the 70s is now serving basically the opposite purpose. The sex articles are no longer there to empower women, but to remind us how woefully inadequate we would be as lovers without Cosmo's sage advice.
I remember in high school, when my friends and I thought it was hilarious to pick a Cosmo article at random and read it out loud to each other in a crowded bookstore.
My Letter To Cosmopolitan Magazine
I think the worst was one going into great detail about how, exactly to move your hand around your guy's penis during a hand job. Faux liberation strikes again. I bought an old copy of Cosmopolitan from for five bucks at a used bookstore. It features two short stories one a man vs. I assumed that it was a different magazine, even though it shared the name, until I looked up the Wikipedia article later.
It might be "harrowingly explicit" but it's also completely useless as a sex manual. The advice it gives is all horrible, and the way they present it by suggesting 'hot surprises' instead of encouraging you to talk to your partner and actually find out what you'd both like is even worse. It's a gender role indoctrination manual that encourages insecurity and discourages communication across gender lines. My wife used to get Cosmo for light reading. I leafed through it from time to time laughing at some of the absolutely ridiculous statements in the articles like "men don't like to cuddle.
Recently, supermarkets in my area have started obscuring the cover of Cosmo on the racks. I mean, it's not like Cosmo used to be less sexist. Maybe it was more intellectually stimulating, but weren't most of the stories written by men anyway? No guarantees of female empowerment there. I think it's really fascinating how it's changed over the years, along with other non-lady-centric publications, but the "eugh, all it has these days is SEX MANUALS" commentary strikes me as not terribly progressive. One aspect of the continued popularity of Cosmo that needs to be taken into account is that the magazine wouldn't be printing the "articles" that it does if the readers didn't respond to them and purchase them due to the racy and sexist content.
If women don't want to be portrayed as a man's sexual object then maybe they shouldn't be reading a magazine that is teaching them how to be exactly that. Cosmo is only living up to the standards that we as a society are holding it to. That being said, sometimes women do want advice on sex and there is nothing wrong with that as long as it doesn't turn into a culture of women simply striving to please their men without any reciprocal reward.
And it would be nice if Cosmo branched out into other subjects that women are interested in, they could draw in a larger audience and thus more profits if they didn't so narrowly limit their content to one of a sexual nature. The Evolution of Cosmopolitan Magazine — a very interesting retrospective of the history of Cosmo magazine. Christie, the Senior Web Editor for Cosmopolitan. I think it's great you dug up those old covers For those of you interested in seeing more, I just wanted to pass on our online Cosmo Cover Gallery, which has covers from the past 10 years.
We really enjoy the older Cosmopolitan magazines. Stunning covers and great literature combined! They should bring back the illustrated cover and excellent literature.